Penn hates cancer more than Temple

More than 1,000 walked around in a circle and other stuff to raise funds for cancer research, part of the 5th annual Relay for Life, held in the Student Pavilion on Friday.

As Event Chair and junior public relations major Beth Davis told The Temple News on the video below that was posted after the event here, the event reached its goal of raising more than $40,500.

Truly a great event, and holler at men’s basketball coach Fran Dunphy for filling in as the event’s keynote speaker.

Still, that total was less than a third of what Dunphy’s former home, the University of Pennsylvania, raised in its Relay for Life, despite having some 13,000 less students, as reported by The Temple News today.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5sLkHHLciA 350 292]

Temple Republicans love Chelsea Clinton

Chelsea Clinton was on Main Campus last week, stumping for her moms presidential bid. She spoke at a well-attended event in McGonigle Hall and got all sorts of questions, but I’m most interested in a rehashing of one of the most important issues on the campaign trail. Chelsea being hot, and not enough people giving her the credit she deserves for it.

Ryan McCool, the president and long-time face of Temple Republicans, went to the event with the sole intention of getting Chelsea’s phone number. Perhaps just a prank from a McCain supporter, but check the video coverage from The Temple News to see how Chelsea handled it.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sujSbNAjqDU 350 292]

Nuclear power: come on, France does it

If you had five light bulbs, one of them would be powered by nuclear power in Pennsylvania. Or something like that. Columnist Morgan Ashenfelter thinks we need to use a lot more nuclear power, an issue that is super cool to talk about lately.

Check out what presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has to say on the issue of nuclear power.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cZqtrvDIVs 350 292]

Oh, and peep a total ‘Stuff White People Like‘ reference when Clinton hollers at FRANCE in the same way she would for health care. To be fair, Barack would totally do the same, which is pretty good ammunition for when you want to argue if he is white, which plenty of people who don’t know him do.

American False Idol

large-flag-pin.JPG

Karl Rove and Representative Jack Kingston (R-GA) both recently asserted that Obama’s refusal to show patriotism through flag pin adornment is unpatriotic, while not wearing the pin themselves. What they reveal about their ilk is a misunderstanding of patriotism. Flag pins share the same category as magnetic yellow ribbon troop support. This show of support is something nonpermanent, requiring no sacrifice. The flag pins many of our public officials wear allow them to ensconce themselves in the aura of patriotism, the only cost being the pin might disrupt a thread or two in the fabric of one’s suit coat.

I am not religious, but I do believe the Bible sometimes contains good common sense. The 2nd commandment forbids worship of graven images. I view this as a condemnation of worshiping some shiny surrogate for show rather than truly following The Lord. Obama’s pastor’s words generated much discussion about race, and I hope that one enduring legacy of this campaign is an honest dialog being initiated. All the aspersions against Obama/Wright’s patriotism should spur a dialog about the nature of true patriotism. What Jeremiah Wright said was wrong; and, as Obama explained, it comes from the bitterness and anger from his experiences as a black man of a certain age. However, Wright waived student deferment to enlist in the military, just after integration. He served six years, some as a cardiopulmonary technician, caring for President Johnson at one point. The same-aged Dick Cheney, who stated “I had priorities in the 60’s other than military service,” took five deferments. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both avoided active military service during the Vietnam war using deferments and family connections. Is Wright less patriotic because of his exercise of free speech?

Patriotism is a word that should be indelibly linked with sacrifice. When we read about World War 2, there is always a description of how much civilians were willing to sacrifice. That was patriotism. Where is that today? We are locked in what is described as a supreme struggle for our way of life against the terrorists. Yet, we are rarely asked to sacrifice anything. This is a direct product of the understanding of the nature of patriotism. It has become the public worship of false idols. Such a profound misunderstanding is quite damaging and is easily manipulated, allowing baseless accusations to gain traction.

You know Chelsea Clinton is super hot

Yo, seriously, how is there any debate? Chelsea Clinton is hot.

Check out this video by The Temple News on a recent appearance Hillary’s daughter made in Philadelphia, and try to tell me differently.

[youtube:http://youtube.com/watch?v=KJQKXIQvn2Q 350 292]

That’s a far cry from her early days as the first child in White House.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8T9lU4aTbg&feature=related 350 292]

Chelsea has been used a great deal by the Clinton campaign.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V92CbMElY6c 350 292]

Yet, there has been lots of talk about Chelsea being used for the Hillary campaign. The junior Senator from New York addressed attacks of her “pimping out” Chelsea.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-CaXDO52eA 350 292]

Check out others taking up the debate.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuFH3gzkUgI&NR=1 350 292]

Unnecessary Vitriol

obamaclinton

I would like to wade into the morass of the election for one moment. There are three viable candidates, and I find them to all be appealing, capable Americans. For my first time as a functioning adult, it seems that we have an embarrassment of riches with regard to presidential candidates. Certainly, none are without their flaws and drawbacks; after all, they are politicians. However, I could comfortably cast a vote for Obama, Clinton, or McCain.

The Democrats, in particular, seem blessed. I happen to be a lazy supporter of Obama (meaning I do not do anything to advance his candidacy), but I think Hillary Clinton would do a good job, as well. I do not care for her personally, but I think the last eight years have established that voting based upon hypothetically enjoying a candidate’s company over a beer is simply foolish. Furthermore, we have two candidates on the Democratic side from demographic groups generally underrepresented in the halls of power in the United States, i.e. a woman and a man of mixed race.

This should be a time of hope for Americans yet the amount of vitriol being injected into the Democratic primary by supporters of Clinton and Obama is staggering. There have been innuendos about race and gender, purported Islamic adherence, the blue dress, Mccarthyism, etc; the list is endless. A new poll conducted by the New York Times asserts that the acrimony is causing supporters from both sides to state they would choose McCain over the rival Democratic candidate. Who are these rabid supporters? Well, many of them are people with nothing better to do that sit around working themselves into a froth over minutiae. They have let their emotion cloud their sense. We have two candidates who differ little on policy. I have my reasons for supporting Obama, which I will not get into now, but I recognize the similarities. I just find it silly that two groups of hardcore Democrats are willing to vote against their beliefs due to an irrational distaste of the rival candidate; silly, but not surprising. I seem to remember a fear over homosexuals, abortions, and homosexuals performing abortions somehow being injected into legitimate political debate a few years back. As a result, we have a president with whom we could enjoy collectively sharing an ice cold Odouls.